Nexinc Integrated EA Maturity Assessment Tool

Assessment Flow

Lead details first, then generic assessment, then optional industry module.

Step 1

Company and email

Step 2

Generic maturity diagnostic

Step 3

Industry module (optional)

Step 4

Report and next steps

Your Details

Required to start

Executive Report

Summary, maturity level, strengths, gaps, and a next-step recommendation.

Ready

Generic Score

—

Industry Score

—

Suggested Next Step

—

Optional: 3-day discovery workshop

Executive Heatmap

Snapshot of scores by question. 1 = Ad Hoc, 5 = Optimized.

Dimension	Question	Score	Heat

Interpretation: 1-2 indicates foundational gaps, 3 indicates stable baseline, 4-5 indicates scalable practice.

Section Breakdown

Where the maturity is strong vs weak.

Key Recommendations

Auto-generated from low scores.

Copy-friendly Summary

Sources used as inspiration (as provided in the questionnaire): EPRI, The Open Group, Ardoq, LeanIX, Mos Academy, Medium.

Actions

Export your responses or generate a PDF.

“Send Report” posts to your endpoint. If not configured, it opens an email draft.

Generic EA Maturity

10-point diagnostic. Score each 1 to 5.

Locked

I. Foundation and Strategy

II. Process and Execution

III. Integration and Quality

You can skip the industry module later. This just unlocks the next section.

Industry Module

Optional. Choose one industry for targeted questions.

Locked

Select Industry

Choose one. We generate a separate industry score.

Benchmarking Guide

Level 1–2: Traditional, manual governance, reactive.
Level 3: Digital adopter, APIs and cloud migration in progress.
Level 4–5: Intelligent platform, automated compliance, architecture-as-code.

Scoring Logic

10–20: Initial. Dependent on heroics, no formal process.
21–30: Developing. Forming but inconsistent, mostly IT-focused.
31–40: Defined. Documented and followed by most.
41–45: Managed. Measured and proactive decision support.
46–50: Optimizing. Strategic partner driving continuous transformation.

Industry module is scored separately. It is best used to highlight domain-specific risks and priorities.